home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=92TT1852>
- <title>
- Aug. 17, 1992: Unfriendly Skies
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
- Aug. 17, 1992 The Balkans: Must It Go On?
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- U.S. CAMPAIGN, Page 34
- Unfriendly Skies
- </hdr><body>
- <p>Faced with its own explosive issues, the G.O.P. heads to Houston
- on a wing and a prayer
- </p>
- <p>By Garry Wills/Houston
- </p>
- <p> In this topsy-turvy political year, the Democrats were as
- smug as Republicans at their New York convention, and the
- Republicans seem fated to be as fratricidal as Democrats this
- month in Houston. There is an eerie symmetry at work. Jeane
- Kirkpatrick, in her book justifying the neoconservatives'
- abandonment of the Democratic Party, described the 1972
- Democratic Convention as out of touch with ordinary Americans.
- The New Presidential Elite argued that Democrats under McGovern
- were more interested in ideological purity than in winning, more
- concerned with being "correct" than with being inclusive. It was
- a party of rectitude and litmus tests. By contrast, the
- Republicans spread a big tent: "Less intense, less holistic
- ideologically, and deeply attached to party, the cultural
- conservative focused more on building party unity and winning
- elections than on articulating correct issue positions--not
- because he was uninterested in policy, but because he was also
- strongly attached to the party by fun, friends, and status
- satisfactions, and party loyalty as well as policy." The
- Republicans, she concluded, believe in the political market and
- in peddling a winning product there.
- </p>
- <p> Few expect the Republicans to be guided, at this year's
- convention, by "fun, friends, and status satisfactions," though
- they have the prevalent product in a sitting President. All the
- tests of political correctness--on abortion, on homosexuality,
- on not raising taxes, on control of the arts--are matters of
- Republican concern this time. This is a party of purges, not
- inclusion: it cries for the heads of Richard Darman, Nicholas
- Brady, William Reilly, even of Dan Quayle, even of George Bush.
- The party is in so little inclusive a mood that it only
- grudgingly continues to include its own President.
- </p>
- <p> The very issues that were emphasized in order to divide
- the Democrats have boomeranged, and are splitting the
- Republicans. Dinesh D'Souza, in his book on Jerry Falwell,
- Falwell: Before the Millennium, describes how the religious
- right planned to use abortion as a wedge issue. At sessions to
- form the Moral Majority, Paul Weyrich said the movement should
- "focus attention on the abortion issue, because it would split
- the Democratic Party, while hardly affecting the Republican
- vote." Paradoxically, the very decision they hated--Roe v.
- Wade--gave these political operatives the cover they needed:
- so long as that ruling was in effect, Republicans could give lip
- service to a "right to life" without facing immediate
- consequences. But with Roe endangered, the prospect of
- legislatures' having to debate the whole matter over again is
- daunting. The preference for choice, even among those opposed
- to abortion, is clear in the polls. Young Republicans do not
- have to be libertarians to want government kept out of the
- decisions women make about their pregnancies.
- </p>
- <p> Abortion now plagues the Republicans far more than it ever
- did the Democrats. So do most of the social issues that
- Republicans stressed in the past and are still trying to use,
- in a more guarded way, when Dan Quayle speaks of family values.
- Homosexuality was a Republican issue when the party made fun of
- "San Francisco Democrats." But now, when almost everyone has
- known someone with AIDS, when people fear that they or their
- children may get it, the Republican position, dictated by the
- party's religious constituents, seems not only cruel but
- dangerous. The party opposes free distribution of condoms and
- clean drug needles. It still blocks sex education, family
- planning at home and abroad, and full-scale research expenditure
- on AIDS. Bob Hattoy, the AIDS-infected man who spoke at the
- Democratic Convention, gave a whole new meaning to "family
- values" when he reminded the President that "your family has
- AIDS"--part of that large national family New York Governor
- Mario Cuomo described at the convention.
- </p>
- <p> "Family values" takes on new meaning, as well, at a time
- when people are worried that they will not be able to educate
- their children, give medical aid to their parents or support
- themselves in retirement. The economy, which has devastated
- black families, threatens white ones too. The "no new taxes" cry
- was potent when enough of the electorate felt satisfied with
- what it had and wanted to give no more to the government. But
- when basic services are in question, people remember that the
- government is still good for something. That is a point the
- Republicans have been denying for over a decade. Ronald Reagan
- said the government could do nothing but fight communists--a
- mission it lacks today--and otherwise it should just be taken
- "off our backs."
- </p>
- <p> Nothing could better demonstrate how former sources of
- strength have become signs of weakness than the scheduling of
- a convention speech by Ronald Reagan. That would until recently
- have been considered a surefire way of rallying the troops with
- memories of glory. But every reaffirmation of Reaganism traps
- Bush more helplessly in the real Reagan legacy--the deficit
- that Reaganites are prevented from addressing. They cannot even
- admit it is a problem without being called defectors from the
- great man's cause. Reagan will come to forgive George Bush for
- raising taxes--and to make sure he never does it again. Which
- means that Bush will be as weak in a second term as in the
- first. Realists, of course, see this ghost from the past as an
- incubus.
- </p>
- <p> Conventions for the incumbent are supposed to be
- ceremonial reaffirmations of the regnant leader. This one is
- flirting with thoughts of regicide. The Republicans are acting
- less like Democrats than like the early leaders of Students for
- a Democratic Society, busily excommunicating each other,
- thundering mutual anathemas.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-